The European Commission released its decision on the International Skating Union eligibility rules

The European Commission released its decision on the International Skating Union eligibility rules

On 8 December 2017, the European Commission decided that the International Skating Union (ISU) rules imposing severe penalties on athletes participating in unofficial speed skating competitions breach EU antitrust law. The ISU must now change these rules. The decision could have a wider impact and affect all sport federations.

The investigation carried out by the DG Competition found out that the eligibility rules applied by the ice-skating federation were imposed despite the absence of threat to legitimate sports objectives. At the same time, those restrictions favour the own commercial interest of the ISU, disregarding the athletes and organisers of other events. The Commission stated that it prevents the creation of innovative competition formats since the organisers are unable to attract elite athletes to their new event. By limiting the development of alternative speed skating competition, it restricts the potential competition on the relevant market, to the detriment of ice-skating fans.

The ISU Eligibility rules are binding on all its members and their affiliated clubs. Because of their binding nature the Eligibility rules have the effect of coordinating the behaviour of the ISU Members. The Commission therefore concluded that those rules constitute a decision of an association of undertakings within the meaning of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

The European Commission also sees a conflict of interest in ISU being both regulator and organiser of sport competitions. In this regard, all ISU decisions should be non-discriminatory and based on transparent criteria.

The Commission required the ISU to stop its “illegal conduct” within 90 days (i.e. by mid-March at the latest). The Commission abstained to impose a fine in this case but - if the ISU fails to comply with the Commission's decision - it would be liable for non-compliance payments of up to 5% of its average daily worldwide turnover.

When assessing the structural impact of this ruling, it seems clear that it is not the Commission’s intention to attack the Pyramidal structure of Sport or even to question the role of the federations in safeguarding the integrity, the proper conduct of sport and in guaranteeing safety and health of athletes. Moreover, the abstention from a direct financial fine shows that the EU acknowledges the different steps already taken by the ISU to change their rules.

However, the application of Art. 101 TFEU constitutes a real threat. Following the rationale of DG COMP, all international and European federations could be qualified as cartels. That interpretation is not acceptable. The Commission has applied the competition rules in a purely economic way and has not sufficiently taken into account the societal role of federations, the existing solidarity mechanisms, the investments in youth and women sport as described in Art. 165 TFEU.

Further information

Press release

COMP Commissioner Vestager’s statement

POLITICO interview with Vestager on the impact of the ruling

Thomas Bach’s speech at the EU Council on the social role of Sport (November 2017)

Recent Posts

Building bridges: German sport meets EU priorities

This week the EOC EU Office hosted the 35th Gemeinschaftstagung Internationales, bringing to Brussels a dynamic delegation from Germany’s Landessportbünde, Landessportjugenden, the DOSB and the dsj. Over two productive days, delegates swapped insights on their European and global project pipelines, compared strategies for international engagement and took a deep dive into the fast-evolving EU sport-policy […]

Read More
EU Budget 2028-2034: time to widely spread our demands to policymakers!

The EOC EU Office is coordinating an advocacy initiative to ensure that organised sport is represented in the EU’s next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034. Backed by 48 National Olympic Committees, the IOC, the European Paralympic Committee, ASOIF, and most of its partner international and European federations, the joint position paper outlining our recommendations was […]

Read More
Monthly Report Highlight - Explanatory Guide to the Microplastics Regulation: Updates for the Sport Sector

On 31 March 2025, the European Commission published an Explanatory Guide complementing the 2023 Regulation on synthetic polymer microparticles (SPM), amending Annex XVII of the REACH Regulation, widely known as the “Microplastics Regulation”.  As a reminder, the 2023 Regulation directly impacted the sport sector by introducing a ban on the placing on the market of […]

Read More

Related Posts

May 23, 2025
Building bridges: German sport meets EU priorities

This week the EOC EU Office hosted the 35th Gemeinschaftstagung Internationales, bringing to Brussels a dynamic delegation from Germany’s Landessportbünde, Landessportjugenden, the DOSB and the dsj. Over two productive days, delegates swapped insights on their European and global project pipelines, compared strategies for international engagement and took a deep dive into the fast-evolving EU sport-policy […]

May 23, 2025
EU Budget 2028-2034: time to widely spread our demands to policymakers!

The EOC EU Office is coordinating an advocacy initiative to ensure that organised sport is represented in the EU’s next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034. Backed by 48 National Olympic Committees, the IOC, the European Paralympic Committee, ASOIF, and most of its partner international and European federations, the joint position paper outlining our recommendations was […]

May 19, 2025
Monthly Report Highlight - Explanatory Guide to the Microplastics Regulation: Updates for the Sport Sector

On 31 March 2025, the European Commission published an Explanatory Guide complementing the 2023 Regulation on synthetic polymer microparticles (SPM), amending Annex XVII of the REACH Regulation, widely known as the “Microplastics Regulation”.  As a reminder, the 2023 Regulation directly impacted the sport sector by introducing a ban on the placing on the market of […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram