ECJ rules that Bridge is not a Sport for purposes of VAT Directive

ECJ rules that Bridge is not a Sport for purposes of VAT Directive

On 26 October 2017, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its judgement on the ‘English Bridge Union (EBU)’ case. The Court stated that the physical aspect of bridge is negligible. It therefore rejected EBU’s claim to fall under the concept of sport and to benefit from the tax-exemption allocated to such activity.

The EBU is the British body accountable for the organisation of ‘duplicate bridge’ tournaments. This variant of bridge consists of a card game where each duo successively plays the same hands as their opponents at the other tables: winning thus implies a relative better performance. This game can be played competitively, even at international level.

When organising a championship, the players have to pay a participation fee, and the EBU has to pay a Value Added Tax on those fees. In 2015, the English Bridge Union made an application for repayment of this tax to the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (i.e. UK’s tax authority). Indeed, they believed that - as a sport - they deserved the tax exemption granted by the VAT Directive (2006/112/EC). Their legal action against the tax authority was rejected since the physical element of this activity was not considered to be significant enough to be tax-exempted.

After receiving the case on appeal, the British Upper Tribunal asked the European court of justice to define the concept of ‘sport’ mentioned in the VAT Directive. In June of this year, ECJ’s Advocate General, Maciej Szpunar gave an encouraging opinion for the EBU. He had recommended that ‘sport’ had to be conceived as the training of mental or physical fitness in a beneficial way for the citizens’ wellbeing. Following this description, bridge - a game that involves logic, memory and anticipation - would be a ‘sport’.

However, a few months later, the ECJ did not agree with this interpretation and strictly limited the concept of ‘sport’ (as mentioned in the VAT Directive) to be activities “characterised by a not negligible physical element”. Although duplicate bridge is favourable for the mental and physical health of its players, it does not imply that it is a sport, even when played competitively. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that the ECJ’s interpretation does not jeopardise bridge’s chance to be covered by the concept of ‘cultural services’ noticed in the same article of the VAT Directive.

FURTHER INFORMATION

ECJ Press Release

ECJ Judgement on the case (C-90/16)

Advocate General Szpunar’s opinion (June)

Recent Posts

Positioning the European Olympic Movement in the upcoming Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034

On 24 April, the EOC EU Office held an online exchange with partner organisations and representatives of the EU 27 NOCs on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028-2034, discussing key priorities for organised sport to be recognised by EU institutions during the preparation of the forthcoming MFF. Ensuring prompt discussion and advocacy remains essential for the […]

Read More
OCEAN Final Conference: The start of a movement for climate action in sport

The EOC EU Office is delighted to invite you to the OCEAN Project Final Conference: Reducing sport organisations' carbon footprint: Understanding our impact and acting for change, taking place on 13 May in a hybrid format in Brussels and online. After 2.5 years of trainings, discussions and concrete initiatives, Climate Action Officers from 18 National […]

Read More
Monthly Report Highlight - European Sport Model: European Parliament gathers sport stakeholders to discuss the model’s future

On 18 March 2025, the European Olympic Committees (EOC) EU Office participated in a high-level stakeholders’ dialogue hosted by the European Parliament to discuss its upcoming own-initiative report on the “Role of EU Policies in Shaping the European Sport Model (ESM)”. The event, moderated by the rapporteur, Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Bogdan Zdrojewski […]

Read More

Related Posts

April 25, 2025
Positioning the European Olympic Movement in the upcoming Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034

On 24 April, the EOC EU Office held an online exchange with partner organisations and representatives of the EU 27 NOCs on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028-2034, discussing key priorities for organised sport to be recognised by EU institutions during the preparation of the forthcoming MFF. Ensuring prompt discussion and advocacy remains essential for the […]

April 18, 2025
OCEAN Final Conference: The start of a movement for climate action in sport

The EOC EU Office is delighted to invite you to the OCEAN Project Final Conference: Reducing sport organisations' carbon footprint: Understanding our impact and acting for change, taking place on 13 May in a hybrid format in Brussels and online. After 2.5 years of trainings, discussions and concrete initiatives, Climate Action Officers from 18 National […]

April 16, 2025
Monthly Report Highlight - European Sport Model: European Parliament gathers sport stakeholders to discuss the model’s future

On 18 March 2025, the European Olympic Committees (EOC) EU Office participated in a high-level stakeholders’ dialogue hosted by the European Parliament to discuss its upcoming own-initiative report on the “Role of EU Policies in Shaping the European Sport Model (ESM)”. The event, moderated by the rapporteur, Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Bogdan Zdrojewski […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram