ECJ rules that Bridge is not a Sport for purposes of VAT Directive

ECJ rules that Bridge is not a Sport for purposes of VAT Directive

On 26 October 2017, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its judgement on the ‘English Bridge Union (EBU)’ case. The Court stated that the physical aspect of bridge is negligible. It therefore rejected EBU’s claim to fall under the concept of sport and to benefit from the tax-exemption allocated to such activity.

The EBU is the British body accountable for the organisation of ‘duplicate bridge’ tournaments. This variant of bridge consists of a card game where each duo successively plays the same hands as their opponents at the other tables: winning thus implies a relative better performance. This game can be played competitively, even at international level.

When organising a championship, the players have to pay a participation fee, and the EBU has to pay a Value Added Tax on those fees. In 2015, the English Bridge Union made an application for repayment of this tax to the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (i.e. UK’s tax authority). Indeed, they believed that - as a sport - they deserved the tax exemption granted by the VAT Directive (2006/112/EC). Their legal action against the tax authority was rejected since the physical element of this activity was not considered to be significant enough to be tax-exempted.

After receiving the case on appeal, the British Upper Tribunal asked the European court of justice to define the concept of ‘sport’ mentioned in the VAT Directive. In June of this year, ECJ’s Advocate General, Maciej Szpunar gave an encouraging opinion for the EBU. He had recommended that ‘sport’ had to be conceived as the training of mental or physical fitness in a beneficial way for the citizens’ wellbeing. Following this description, bridge - a game that involves logic, memory and anticipation - would be a ‘sport’.

However, a few months later, the ECJ did not agree with this interpretation and strictly limited the concept of ‘sport’ (as mentioned in the VAT Directive) to be activities “characterised by a not negligible physical element”. Although duplicate bridge is favourable for the mental and physical health of its players, it does not imply that it is a sport, even when played competitively. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that the ECJ’s interpretation does not jeopardise bridge’s chance to be covered by the concept of ‘cultural services’ noticed in the same article of the VAT Directive.

FURTHER INFORMATION

ECJ Press Release

ECJ Judgement on the case (C-90/16)

Advocate General Szpunar’s opinion (June)

Recent Posts

Building bridges: German sport meets EU priorities

This week the EOC EU Office hosted the 35th Gemeinschaftstagung Internationales, bringing to Brussels a dynamic delegation from Germany’s Landessportbünde, Landessportjugenden, the DOSB and the dsj. Over two productive days, delegates swapped insights on their European and global project pipelines, compared strategies for international engagement and took a deep dive into the fast-evolving EU sport-policy […]

Read More
EU Budget 2028-2034: time to widely spread our demands to policymakers!

The EOC EU Office is coordinating an advocacy initiative to ensure that organised sport is represented in the EU’s next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034. Backed by 48 National Olympic Committees, the IOC, the European Paralympic Committee, ASOIF, and most of its partner international and European federations, the joint position paper outlining our recommendations was […]

Read More
Monthly Report Highlight - Explanatory Guide to the Microplastics Regulation: Updates for the Sport Sector

On 31 March 2025, the European Commission published an Explanatory Guide complementing the 2023 Regulation on synthetic polymer microparticles (SPM), amending Annex XVII of the REACH Regulation, widely known as the “Microplastics Regulation”.  As a reminder, the 2023 Regulation directly impacted the sport sector by introducing a ban on the placing on the market of […]

Read More

Related Posts

May 23, 2025
Building bridges: German sport meets EU priorities

This week the EOC EU Office hosted the 35th Gemeinschaftstagung Internationales, bringing to Brussels a dynamic delegation from Germany’s Landessportbünde, Landessportjugenden, the DOSB and the dsj. Over two productive days, delegates swapped insights on their European and global project pipelines, compared strategies for international engagement and took a deep dive into the fast-evolving EU sport-policy […]

May 23, 2025
EU Budget 2028-2034: time to widely spread our demands to policymakers!

The EOC EU Office is coordinating an advocacy initiative to ensure that organised sport is represented in the EU’s next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034. Backed by 48 National Olympic Committees, the IOC, the European Paralympic Committee, ASOIF, and most of its partner international and European federations, the joint position paper outlining our recommendations was […]

May 19, 2025
Monthly Report Highlight - Explanatory Guide to the Microplastics Regulation: Updates for the Sport Sector

On 31 March 2025, the European Commission published an Explanatory Guide complementing the 2023 Regulation on synthetic polymer microparticles (SPM), amending Annex XVII of the REACH Regulation, widely known as the “Microplastics Regulation”.  As a reminder, the 2023 Regulation directly impacted the sport sector by introducing a ban on the placing on the market of […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram