ECJ Advocate General’s opinion published in English Bridge Union Case

ECJ Advocate General’s opinion published in English Bridge Union Case

On 15 June 2017, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) published the opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in the English Bridge Union (EBU) Case (C-90/16). The case is based on a referral for preliminary ruling by the British Upper Tribunal to the ECJ on the question whether contract or duplicate bridge is a sport within article 132(1) (m) of the Principal VAT Directive. The Upper Tribunal further wanted to know if an activity needed to have a significant physical element to count as a sport for this directive.
 
The opinion initially clarifies that the exemptions listed in the VAT directive are not optional: If conditions are met, then Member States are obliged to exempt transactions from VAT. Although there have been previous cases regarding VAT exemptions and sport, and even the combination of the two, there is currently no Union wide all-encompassing definition of sport which would apply throughout the EU for every act of law. Therefore, the Advocate General looked at the wording, system, context/objectives and history of the VAT Directive to decide on an interpretation. 
 
On the basis of these factors, he argues that the VAT Directive does not imply that “sport necessitates a physical element”. The rationale behind the exemption stems from Article 165 TFEU, which states that the Union is “to contribute to the promotion of European sporting issues, while taking account of the specific nature of sport”. Since there is no uniform definition of sport in EU legislation, the question at hand is not whether sport according to some definition needs to have a physical component, but specifically, whether the activities benefitting from the VAT exemption under the term ‘sport’ need to include an element of physical effort or exertion. The international status granted by the IOC to certain mental sports or activities without a physical element implies a certain acceptance by the public for seeing such activities as sports. 
 
Subsequently, the opinion arrives at a list of prerequisites for a sport in the context of the VAT directive:
  • A sport requires a certain effort to overcome a challenge or an obstacle (and are thus not purely recreational);
  • The overcoming of these challenges trains a certain physical or mental skill and thereby yields benefits for the physical or mental wellbeing of the persons engaging in the sport;
  • Such activities are usually practised not solely in a purely commercial context:
  • (Local) public perception or international recognition serve as an indication pointing to the existence of a ‘sport’. There is a cultural component to this, as some sports are regional or more prevalent in certain countries.
 
Following this interpretation, the Advocate General finally advises the ECJ to answer the British court’s question in the sense that “among the characteristics an activity must exhibit in order for it to be a ‘sport’ within the meaning of Article 132(1)(m) of […]the ‘VAT Directive’ a physical element is not necessary.” and that Duplicate contract bridge is a sport regarding the exemption in the VAT Directive.
 
A longer analysis of the General Advocate’s opinion can be found on the EOC EU Office intranet. A date for the delivery of the ECJ’s preliminary ruling has not been defined yet.
 
FURTHER INFORMATION
 

Recent Posts

SAFE HARBOUR Project Meeting 2 in Bucharest

The SAFE HARBOUR consortium met this week in Bucharest, Romania, for its second project meeting, reaffirming its commitment to strengthening safeguarding across European sport. Hosted by the Romanian Olympic and Sports Committee in a hybrid format, the two-day meeting brought together partners to exchange insights, review progress, and plan next steps. Discussions focused on key […]

Read More
EmpowHER Volleyball: New insights on gender equality in sport leadership

The EmpowHER Volleyball Game Changer (EVGC) project, led by the European Volleyball Confederation (CEV) and co-funded by the EU, has released its Gender Equality Survey Analysis, highlighting the continued underrepresentation of women in volleyball leadership across Europe. Based on over 820 responses, the study shows that women hold only 11–30% of leadership roles, with few […]

Read More
SAFE HARBOUR promoted during the Educational Module 2 of the GUARD project

On 14 October 2025, the SAFE HARBOUR project was presented during Module 2 of the Educational Training within the GUARD Project, held in Zagreb. Together, these initiatives provide a comprehensive approach to advancing safeguarding standards at all levels of European sport. During the session, participants explored how SAFE HARBOUR reviews the GAP Report to identify […]

Read More

Related Posts

October 27, 2025
SAFE HARBOUR Project Meeting 2 in Bucharest

The SAFE HARBOUR consortium met this week in Bucharest, Romania, for its second project meeting, reaffirming its commitment to strengthening safeguarding across European sport. Hosted by the Romanian Olympic and Sports Committee in a hybrid format, the two-day meeting brought together partners to exchange insights, review progress, and plan next steps. Discussions focused on key […]

October 17, 2025
EmpowHER Volleyball: New insights on gender equality in sport leadership

The EmpowHER Volleyball Game Changer (EVGC) project, led by the European Volleyball Confederation (CEV) and co-funded by the EU, has released its Gender Equality Survey Analysis, highlighting the continued underrepresentation of women in volleyball leadership across Europe. Based on over 820 responses, the study shows that women hold only 11–30% of leadership roles, with few […]

October 17, 2025
SAFE HARBOUR promoted during the Educational Module 2 of the GUARD project

On 14 October 2025, the SAFE HARBOUR project was presented during Module 2 of the Educational Training within the GUARD Project, held in Zagreb. Together, these initiatives provide a comprehensive approach to advancing safeguarding standards at all levels of European sport. During the session, participants explored how SAFE HARBOUR reviews the GAP Report to identify […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram