Advocate General's opinion on the Super League case states that FIFA-UEFA rules under which any new competition is subject to prior approval are compatible with EU competition law

Advocate General's opinion on the Super League case states that FIFA-UEFA rules under which any new competition is subject to prior approval are compatible with EU competition law


On 15 December, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) published Advocate General Rantos’ Opinion regarding the Super League case.  The Advocate General suggested that the Court acknowledges the compatibility of European Union competition law with FIFA-UEFA rules. While organizers are allowed to create their own competitions outside of UEFA and FIFA, Rantos said that without their approval, organizers are not permitted to participate in UEFA and FIFA tournaments. According to the Advocate General EU competition rules do not prohibit FIFA, UEFA, their member federations, or their national leagues from issuing sanctions against clubs when those participate in a project to set up a new competition that would risk undermining the objectives that those federations legitimately pursue.  
 

The Opinion strengthens the European Sport Model (“Article 165 TFEU gives expression to the ‘constitutional’ recognition of the ‘European Sports Model”) and also reinforces Art. 165 of the Lisbon Treaty in the application of competition policy to sport “(Art. 165 …emphasises the special social character of that economic activity (of sport), which may justify a difference in treatment in certain respects”). The General Advocate identified the various components of the European Sport Model, including its pyramidal structure, open competitions and financial solidarity. In the application of competition policy to sport, the preservation of these aspects can be seen as a justifiable goal. 

According to a different Advocate General's Opinion, Rantos has requested that the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 16 December 2020, International Skating Union (ISU) v Commission (T-93/18), be set aside in part and requests that it be referred back to the ECJ. In particular, the opinion states that sports federations can prevent athletes from competing in alternative tournaments in some situations without breaking competition law. Sports federations are allowed to act as regulators of their sport and event organisers at the same time, but market access can be denied if legitimate interests are pursued, the objective is reasonable and the measures are proportionate. In addition, Rantos strengthens arbitration in sport, in this case the CAS, by stating: “that the exclusive and binding recourse to arbitration is not to be interpreted as an "enhancing factor" in the sense of a restriction of competition”. 

The European Court of Justice’s final decision in the Super League case is expected in March 2023. The ECJ generally abides by Advocate General’s recommendations.   

Recent Posts

Find your way through the EU funding: How to finance sport related projects?

The European Parliament Research Service, an in-house think tank, has recently published its 2023 Edition – Guide to EU Funding. This document offers a detailed overview of the different funding sources grouped by area of action (e.g. Sport p.109). This is part of the EU's effort to facilitate the diffusion of financial support to regional […]

Read More
Share your views on Erasmus+

The European Commission has initiated a public feedback process regarding the primary education, training, youth, and sports program of the European Union: Erasmus+. This public consultation will feed into the assessment of the Erasmus+ programme’s overall performance. Both individuals and institutions can contribute to the assessment of Erasmus+. Give your opinion until 8 December 2023!

Read More
MEPs condemn gender-based violence on football pitches

A plenary debate on violence and discrimination after the FIFA Women's World Cup was initiated by the Greens on September 14. This was organised as a consequence to the resignation of former President of the Spanish Football Federation Luis Rubiales following his accusation of sexual assault and coercion for kissing Jennifer Hermoso on the lips […]

Read More

Related Posts

September 22, 2023
Find your way through the EU funding: How to finance sport related projects?

The European Parliament Research Service, an in-house think tank, has recently published its 2023 Edition – Guide to EU Funding. This document offers a detailed overview of the different funding sources grouped by area of action (e.g. Sport p.109). This is part of the EU's effort to facilitate the diffusion of financial support to regional […]

September 22, 2023
Share your views on Erasmus+

The European Commission has initiated a public feedback process regarding the primary education, training, youth, and sports program of the European Union: Erasmus+. This public consultation will feed into the assessment of the Erasmus+ programme’s overall performance. Both individuals and institutions can contribute to the assessment of Erasmus+. Give your opinion until 8 December 2023!

September 15, 2023
MEPs condemn gender-based violence on football pitches

A plenary debate on violence and discrimination after the FIFA Women's World Cup was initiated by the Greens on September 14. This was organised as a consequence to the resignation of former President of the Spanish Football Federation Luis Rubiales following his accusation of sexual assault and coercion for kissing Jennifer Hermoso on the lips […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram