Advocate General's opinion on the Super League case states that FIFA-UEFA rules under which any new competition is subject to prior approval are compatible with EU competition law

Advocate General's opinion on the Super League case states that FIFA-UEFA rules under which any new competition is subject to prior approval are compatible with EU competition law


On 15 December, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) published Advocate General Rantos’ Opinion regarding the Super League case.  The Advocate General suggested that the Court acknowledges the compatibility of European Union competition law with FIFA-UEFA rules. While organizers are allowed to create their own competitions outside of UEFA and FIFA, Rantos said that without their approval, organizers are not permitted to participate in UEFA and FIFA tournaments. According to the Advocate General EU competition rules do not prohibit FIFA, UEFA, their member federations, or their national leagues from issuing sanctions against clubs when those participate in a project to set up a new competition that would risk undermining the objectives that those federations legitimately pursue.  
 

The Opinion strengthens the European Sport Model (“Article 165 TFEU gives expression to the ‘constitutional’ recognition of the ‘European Sports Model”) and also reinforces Art. 165 of the Lisbon Treaty in the application of competition policy to sport “(Art. 165 …emphasises the special social character of that economic activity (of sport), which may justify a difference in treatment in certain respects”). The General Advocate identified the various components of the European Sport Model, including its pyramidal structure, open competitions and financial solidarity. In the application of competition policy to sport, the preservation of these aspects can be seen as a justifiable goal. 

According to a different Advocate General's Opinion, Rantos has requested that the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 16 December 2020, International Skating Union (ISU) v Commission (T-93/18), be set aside in part and requests that it be referred back to the ECJ. In particular, the opinion states that sports federations can prevent athletes from competing in alternative tournaments in some situations without breaking competition law. Sports federations are allowed to act as regulators of their sport and event organisers at the same time, but market access can be denied if legitimate interests are pursued, the objective is reasonable and the measures are proportionate. In addition, Rantos strengthens arbitration in sport, in this case the CAS, by stating: “that the exclusive and binding recourse to arbitration is not to be interpreted as an "enhancing factor" in the sense of a restriction of competition”. 

The European Court of Justice’s final decision in the Super League case is expected in March 2023. The ECJ generally abides by Advocate General’s recommendations.   

Recent Posts

Legal Counsels of EU NOCs meet in Split for third Annual Exchange

On 29–30 April, the third meeting of legal counsels from EU National Olympic Committees (ENOCs) was held in Split, Croatia, hosted by the Croatian Olympic Committee. Opening the event, Croatian NOC President and EOC Executive Committee member Zlatko Mateša highlighted the value of peer-to-peer exchange in generating tangible outcomes and facilitating the sharing of expertise […]

Read More
Positioning the European Olympic Movement in the upcoming Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034

On 24 April, the EOC EU Office held an online exchange with partner organisations and representatives of the EU 27 NOCs on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028-2034, discussing key priorities for organised sport to be recognised by EU institutions during the preparation of the forthcoming MFF. Ensuring prompt discussion and advocacy remains essential for the […]

Read More
OCEAN Final Conference: The start of a movement for climate action in sport

The EOC EU Office is delighted to invite you to the OCEAN Project Final Conference: Reducing sport organisations' carbon footprint: Understanding our impact and acting for change, taking place on 13 May in a hybrid format in Brussels and online. After 2.5 years of trainings, discussions and concrete initiatives, Climate Action Officers from 18 National […]

Read More

Related Posts

May 2, 2025
Legal Counsels of EU NOCs meet in Split for third Annual Exchange

On 29–30 April, the third meeting of legal counsels from EU National Olympic Committees (ENOCs) was held in Split, Croatia, hosted by the Croatian Olympic Committee. Opening the event, Croatian NOC President and EOC Executive Committee member Zlatko Mateša highlighted the value of peer-to-peer exchange in generating tangible outcomes and facilitating the sharing of expertise […]

April 25, 2025
Positioning the European Olympic Movement in the upcoming Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034

On 24 April, the EOC EU Office held an online exchange with partner organisations and representatives of the EU 27 NOCs on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028-2034, discussing key priorities for organised sport to be recognised by EU institutions during the preparation of the forthcoming MFF. Ensuring prompt discussion and advocacy remains essential for the […]

April 18, 2025
OCEAN Final Conference: The start of a movement for climate action in sport

The EOC EU Office is delighted to invite you to the OCEAN Project Final Conference: Reducing sport organisations' carbon footprint: Understanding our impact and acting for change, taking place on 13 May in a hybrid format in Brussels and online. After 2.5 years of trainings, discussions and concrete initiatives, Climate Action Officers from 18 National […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram