Advocate General's opinion on the Super League case states that FIFA-UEFA rules under which any new competition is subject to prior approval are compatible with EU competition law

Advocate General's opinion on the Super League case states that FIFA-UEFA rules under which any new competition is subject to prior approval are compatible with EU competition law


On 15 December, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) published Advocate General Rantos’ Opinion regarding the Super League case.  The Advocate General suggested that the Court acknowledges the compatibility of European Union competition law with FIFA-UEFA rules. While organizers are allowed to create their own competitions outside of UEFA and FIFA, Rantos said that without their approval, organizers are not permitted to participate in UEFA and FIFA tournaments. According to the Advocate General EU competition rules do not prohibit FIFA, UEFA, their member federations, or their national leagues from issuing sanctions against clubs when those participate in a project to set up a new competition that would risk undermining the objectives that those federations legitimately pursue.  
 

The Opinion strengthens the European Sport Model (“Article 165 TFEU gives expression to the ‘constitutional’ recognition of the ‘European Sports Model”) and also reinforces Art. 165 of the Lisbon Treaty in the application of competition policy to sport “(Art. 165 …emphasises the special social character of that economic activity (of sport), which may justify a difference in treatment in certain respects”). The General Advocate identified the various components of the European Sport Model, including its pyramidal structure, open competitions and financial solidarity. In the application of competition policy to sport, the preservation of these aspects can be seen as a justifiable goal. 

According to a different Advocate General's Opinion, Rantos has requested that the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 16 December 2020, International Skating Union (ISU) v Commission (T-93/18), be set aside in part and requests that it be referred back to the ECJ. In particular, the opinion states that sports federations can prevent athletes from competing in alternative tournaments in some situations without breaking competition law. Sports federations are allowed to act as regulators of their sport and event organisers at the same time, but market access can be denied if legitimate interests are pursued, the objective is reasonable and the measures are proportionate. In addition, Rantos strengthens arbitration in sport, in this case the CAS, by stating: “that the exclusive and binding recourse to arbitration is not to be interpreted as an "enhancing factor" in the sense of a restriction of competition”. 

The European Court of Justice’s final decision in the Super League case is expected in March 2023. The ECJ generally abides by Advocate General’s recommendations.   

Recent Posts

EmpowHER Volleyball: New insights on gender equality in sport leadership

The EmpowHER Volleyball Game Changer (EVGC) project, led by the European Volleyball Confederation (CEV) and co-funded by the EU, has released its Gender Equality Survey Analysis, highlighting the continued underrepresentation of women in volleyball leadership across Europe. Based on over 820 responses, the study shows that women hold only 11–30% of leadership roles, with few […]

Read More
SAFE HARBOUR promoted during the Educational Module 2 of the GUARD project

On 14 October 2025, the SAFE HARBOUR project was presented during Module 2 of the Educational Training within the GUARD Project, held in Zagreb. Together, these initiatives provide a comprehensive approach to advancing safeguarding standards at all levels of European sport. During the session, participants explored how SAFE HARBOUR reviews the GAP Report to identify […]

Read More
OCEAN Sport CO2 Calculator promoted to French National Federations

The EOC EU Office participated in the meeting of the Sustainable Development Club in Paris, where 25 National Federations, came together to discuss solutions to climate action in sport, overseen by the French National Olympic and Sports Committee (CNOSF) and the Ministry of Sport. The OCEAN Sport CO₂ Calculator was presented as a practical tool […]

Read More

Related Posts

October 17, 2025
EmpowHER Volleyball: New insights on gender equality in sport leadership

The EmpowHER Volleyball Game Changer (EVGC) project, led by the European Volleyball Confederation (CEV) and co-funded by the EU, has released its Gender Equality Survey Analysis, highlighting the continued underrepresentation of women in volleyball leadership across Europe. Based on over 820 responses, the study shows that women hold only 11–30% of leadership roles, with few […]

October 17, 2025
SAFE HARBOUR promoted during the Educational Module 2 of the GUARD project

On 14 October 2025, the SAFE HARBOUR project was presented during Module 2 of the Educational Training within the GUARD Project, held in Zagreb. Together, these initiatives provide a comprehensive approach to advancing safeguarding standards at all levels of European sport. During the session, participants explored how SAFE HARBOUR reviews the GAP Report to identify […]

October 17, 2025
OCEAN Sport CO2 Calculator promoted to French National Federations

The EOC EU Office participated in the meeting of the Sustainable Development Club in Paris, where 25 National Federations, came together to discuss solutions to climate action in sport, overseen by the French National Olympic and Sports Committee (CNOSF) and the Ministry of Sport. The OCEAN Sport CO₂ Calculator was presented as a practical tool […]

About us

The EOC EU Office is the House of European Sport, representing the European Olympic Committees (EOC), the IOC and other major sport organisations to the European institutions in Brussels.
CONTACT
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram